Sehel Khan
Consumer Rights
(2)
Sehal Khan is the Founder & Managing Partner of Verbis Legis law firm. Khan has over seven years of experience in litigation. He has handled several important cases related to consumer matters, criminal and civil law. Mr. Khan has been appointed as Arbitrators in various matters by reputed Banks.
MATTERS DEALT BY SEHEL KHAN
Criminal
State v. Shakeel and Ors. (u/s 302 IPC), effectively argued on bail before Sessions Court, now moving High Court for the said bail
State v. Sonu @ Rahul (u/s 392, 395, 412 IPC) got bail to my client on 120th day of arrest.
State v. Asif @ Lalla (u/s 392, 395, 412, 120B, 34 IPC) got bail to my client on 119th day of arrest. Currently cross-examining with a senior
State v. Imran (u/s 302 IPC) Cross examining witnesses with my senior since last one year
Imran v. State (Bail Application u/s 439 CrPC) Independently argued on bail before the Hon’ble High Court and got notice issued to prosecution on 28.11.2019
Civil
Naeem v. Saima (Suit for recovery) Hon'ble Judge Ms. Collette Rashmi Kujur was pleased to pass a judgement in my favour (representing the defendant)
AvinashShukla v. TV Today Network Ltd. Argued on maintainability of petition for recovery of damages, representing the plaintiff.
IrfanAleem v. Meem Agro Represented the plaintiff in National Green Tribunal.
Represented M/s Intec Capital regularly with my senior and appeared in more than 100 cases of the nature: Cheque dishonor cases u/s 138 NI Act, Suit for Recovery cases and execution.
Sharib Hasan v. Amit Raikwar Summons issued in favour of complainant u/s 138 NI Act
Kaleem v. Khemchand Summons issued in favour of complainant u/s 138 NI Act
Matrimonial
Uzma v. Mohd.Asif (u/s 12 DV Act) Argued and the interim maintenance was doubled from the existing amount
TasneemHussain v. AzibHussain (u/s 12 DV Act) Filed a case of economic violence and Argued on maintainability, finally husband settled the matter
Tarannum v. Aqeel Ahmed (u/s 125 CrPC) Argued on maintenance and got the interim maintenance reduced (representing the defendant)
Saira Ahmed v. Shehzad Ahmed (u/s 125 CrPC) Represented the petitioner and got notice issued to the opposite party.
Mahua v. Gautam (u/s 12 DV Act) Representing the aggrieved person, fresh case
Consumer
Sehel Khan v. RICOH & Anr. My printer was defective, and the president passed ex-parte orders against the manufacturing company.
Sadaqat Husain v. Karbonn Before CDRF, Sheikh Sarai
Mansoor Ellahi v. Jukaso Before CDRF, Mehrauli
M/s Bajwa Developers v. Gulshan Before NCDRC
Before National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission:
Viva v. Gurpreet
Omaxe Chandigarh v. Nirdosh Kumar Thakur
New India Assurance Co. V. Ali Ahammad
National Insurance v. Triveni Enterprises
Guddi Kanwar v. State of Rajasthan
Pratham Tiwari v. Narendra Kaushik
Life Insurance Corporation v. Mamta Devi Solanki
Corruption
Nadeem Siddiqui versus State (u/s 13(1)(d) of Corruption Act) Successfully argued for anticipatory bail at Chandigarh High Court on 08.02.2019
MORE DETAIL